hale v jennings

Withers v Perry Chain [1961] 1 WLR 1314 Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Vicarious Liability Brice v Brown [1984] 1 All ER 997 The court decided, in this case, that the defendant had brought water to his land in a non-natural use of that land (because water in such quantities is unnatural). Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157 The Brewery History Society. It seems that standing to sue for personal injuries is not confined to . Roberts v Ramsbottom [1980] 1 WLR 823 Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 General Duty of Care 2. Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Cross Case, Giles v Walker Of a thing likely to cause 'mischief' if it escapes although thing need not be inherently dangerous Shiffman v Order of the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem Escape - Read v Lyons, Hale v Jennings, British Celanese v AH Hunt, Transco v Stockport Thing escaping causes damage Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care Alan v El Nasr[1972] 2 WLR 800 Catherine Hicks - of half English descent. Gordon v Selico (1986) 278 EG 53 Shelfer v London Electric Lighting Co (1895) 1 Ch D 287 British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912] AC 673 Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2 Scotson v Pegg[1861] EWHC Exch J2 Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340 Report year ends Sept. 30. Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm) One of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant. Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463 Meering v Grahame-White Aviation (1919) 122 LT 44 Strickland v Turner (1852) 7 Ex 208 1. Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055 Wroth v Tyler [1974] Ch 30, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289 Harvey v Facey [1893] AC 552 Sim v Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237 Biennial 1816-1831. As water is likely to do mischief if it escapes - and this water did escape out of the reservoir and down the mineshafts - the defendant was liable for all the damages that were a natural consequence of that mistake. Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Pearson v Lightning [1998] EWCA Civ 591 Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (general) Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12 Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministers of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497 Employers Liability Chaudry v Prabhaker [1989] 1 WLR 29 1. . Sumpter v Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673, Tate v Williamson (1886) LR 2 Ch App 55 Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550 Each Member's genealogy is stored in a separate tree. Adams v Ursell [1913] 1 Ch 269 Clarke v Dickson (1858) EB & E 148 Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 McDonalds v Steel & Morris [1995] 3 All ER 615 Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 General Duty of Care Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Vicarious Liability The owner of the ride was held liable. The police fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building. Thomas v Thomas (1842) 2 QB 851 Henderson v Arthur [1907] 1 KB 10 Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care Couturier v Hastie(1856) 5 HLC 673 Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075 Bunn & Bunn v Rees & Parker [2002]All ER (D) 81 Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation) 897 (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge Disposal[1993] UKHL 4 L.R. Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Defences There were no significant confirmed earthquakes in or near West Hale Township during February 2023. The Brimnes [1975] QB 929 Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1951] AC 367 Employers Liability Ashton v Turner [1981] l QB One of the chairs broke loose and hit the claimant. Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93 Pinnels Case1602 5 Rep, 117 Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789 Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (planning permission) Black v Fife Coal [1912] AC 149 Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11 Public Duty of Care Roscorla v Thomas (1842) 3 QB 234 We do not provide advice. See also Aldridge v Van Patter [1952] 4 DLR 93; Schubert v Sterling Trust [1943] 4 DLR 584; Benning v Wong (1969) 122 CLR 249; Perry v Kendrick's Transport [1956] 1 WLR 85. Hale v Jennings Bros: 1938 The owner of the fairground was held to be responsible for a chair-o-plane which became detached from the roundabout, because the act of the man 'fooling about on this device' was: 'just the kind of behaviour which ought to have been anticipated as being a likely act with a percentage of users of the apparatus.' Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794 Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615 Performance Cars v Abraham [1962] 1 QB 33 Grainger & Son v Gough [1896] AC 325 Sion v Hampstead HA [1994] EWCA Civ 26 Location: Dallas, TX. 2. Her Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall. Allcard v Skinner (1887) 36 Ch D 145 Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability South Indian Railway Company Ltd. Wells v Cooper (1958) 2 All ER 527 Combien gagne t il d argent ? The main issue for me too is that I need 2-3 solid points around this ground which is based on the case of Rylands v Fletcher and the concept of nuisance. Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence Woods v Durable Suites [1953] 1 WLR 857 De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28 McLoughlin v OBrian [1982] UKHL 3. Merritt v Merritt[1970] 1 WLR 1211 Interfoto Picture Library v Stilletto [1989] QB 433, J Evans v Andrea Merzario [1976] 1 WLR 1078 Hearne Bay Steam Ship v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683 Webb v Beavan (1883) 11 QBD 609 ParkingEye v Beavis [2015] EWCA Civ 402 She was hit by an escaped chair from a chair-o-plane, Held: The court said she could sue for that under the tort of Rylands v Fletcher because the neighbouring attraction was a non natural use of land and it was something that did risk causing mischief if it escaped (although, arguably, it didn't really 'escape' because it never left the fairground. Daulia v Four Millbank Nominees[1978] Ch 231 Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17 Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27 Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352 Walker v Northumberland County Council [1995] 1 All ER 737 The Cenk Kaptanoglu, Progress Bulk Carriers v Tube City [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm) Reeman v Department of Transport [1997] EWCA Civ 1355 Facts: An employee was injured in an explosion at a munitions factory. Google Scholar Holcomb J. E., Williams M. R., Demuth S. (2004). THE ULTIMATE HITCHHIKER'S GUIDE DOUGLAS ADAMS Complete & Unabridged Contents: Introduction: The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 10 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 Chapter 14 Chapter 15 Chapter 16 Chapter 17 Chapter 18 Chapter 19 Chapter 20 Chapter 21 Chapter 22 Chapter 23 Chapter 24 Chapter 25 . Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1 BarryvDavies [2001] All ER 944 Market-leading rankings and editorial commentary - see the top law firms & lawyers for TMT in London Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care Hale G. E. (1998). Hillas v Arcos [1932] UKHL 2 Informacin detallada del sitio web y la empresa: gitelachartreuse.com GTE LA CHARTREUSE - Ervaar ultiem comfort in een smaakvolle omgeving. Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party) Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884) LR 28 Ch D 7 Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a chair- o-plane ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. R v Clarke (1927) 40 CLR 227 Please see our T&Cs. Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218 Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Trespass to the Person Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334 . Morgan v Manser [1948] 1 KB 184 Anglia Television v Reed [1971] 3 All ER 690 Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Pure Economic Loss Phelps v Hillingdon Borough Council [2000] UKHL 47 Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Defences Justice Lawyer 5 minutes know interesting legal matters Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 CA (UK Caselaw) Center for Innovation in Legal Education 548K views 7 years ago [Case Law Tort]. The two cases illustrate how . City and Westminster Properties (1934) Ltd v Mudd [1959] Ch 129 Derry v Peek(1889) 5 TLR 625 3803 White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1998] 3 WLR 1509 Held: The court said that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher doesnt apply because the defendant had not brought the fire onto his land, although he did bring the tyres but they did not escape, Held: The court said that to rely on the defence of an 'act of god', that act of god must be beyond all foreseeability i.e. Spice Girls v Aprila World Service [2002] EMLR 27 Butler Machine Tool v Ex-Cell-O Corp[1979] 1 WLR 401 Facts: There was a fault in the electrical wiring of a business premises and it set fire to a pile of tyres. 39 Eg Miles v Forest Rock Granite Co Ltd (1918) 34 TLR 500; Schiffman v Order of St John [1936] 1 All ER 557; Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579. Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550 Hoenig v Isaacs [1952] 2 All ER 176 Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care Hammond v Osborn [2002] EWCA Civ 885 Hinz v Berry [1970] 2 QB 40 Which case made it so that only reasonably forseeable damage is covered by R v F? The case mentions the flood was one of extraordinary violence, but floods of extraordinary violence must be anticipated as events that are likely to take place from time to time, Facts: The claimant tended a booth at a fair belonging to the claimant. Grogan v Robin Meredith Plant Hire [1996] CLC 1127, Hadley v Baxendale[1854] EWHC Exch J70 What is health surveillance? Manage Settings Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a chair- o-plane ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers) Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 The defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. A voluntary professional association, the TBA offers its members a variety of programs and services designed to assist in professional development and works to build a positive image for the profession in the community. 132 Leaf v International Galleries [1950] 2 KB 86 (Mistake) Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (mischief) HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). DSND Subsea v Petroleum Geo Services [2000] BLR 530 Duress (Legitimate Unlawful Act) Yellowstone clue baffles 'Jeopardy!' contestants on Ken Jennings' final show before hiatus #wanitaxigo swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 Haley v London Electricity Board (BAILII: [1964] UKHL 3 ) [1964] 3 All ER 185, [1965] AC 778 Halsey v Esso [1961] 1 WLR 683 (ICLR) Copyright 2020-2022 Hannah Palmer. Shuey v USA92 U.S. 73 (1875) Held: The defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors. Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image) What are some of :Economics, 1. Phillips v Brooks [1919] 2 KB 243 Granville Oil & Chemicals Ltd. v Davis Turner & Co. Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 570 Facts: An unknown third party maliciously turned on tap water and then blocked all the drains causing the water to flood the neighbouring property. Marvel Super Stories (Book One): All-New Comics from All-Star Cartoonists (English Edition) eBook : Marvel Entertainment, Jennings, John, Various,: Amazon.nl: Kindle Store Rhonda Jennings. Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28 White v John Warwick [1953] 1 WLR 1285 Appleby v Myers (1867) LR 2 CP 65 1 Smith v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41 McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13 Photolibrary Group v Burda Senator Verlag [2008] EWHC 1343 (QB) Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585 Exemption Clauses Berkoff v Burchill [1996] 4 All ER 1008 R v Shorrock [1994] QB 279 Holmes v Ashford [1950] 2 All ER 76 Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232 Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740, LEstrange v Graucob [1934] 2 KB 394 Robert v Gable [2007] EWCA Civ 721 1999), Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge Disposal[1993] UKHL 4, Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267, Macklin and others v Dowsett [2004] EWCA Civ 904, Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524, Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518, McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246, McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377, Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17, Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698, Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011, Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675, National Westminster Bank v Morgan [1985] AC 686, Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532, Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618, Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157, Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441, Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416, Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421, Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386, Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373, Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401, Photolibrary Group v Burda Senator Verlag [2008] EWHC 1343 (QB), Pickfords v Celestica [2003] EWCA Civ 1741, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22, R&B Custom Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 321, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore(1866) LR 1 Ex 109, Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443, Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445, Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705, Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334, Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8, Salt v Stratstone Specialist Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 745, Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970]UKHL 5, Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251, Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd [2007] EWHC 541, The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547, Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854, Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187, Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206, Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371, (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293, Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum [1974] 1 WLR 576, Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884) LR 28 Ch D 7, Spice Girls v Aprila World Service [2002] EMLR 27, Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959, Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593, Stevenson, Jacques v McClean (1880) 5 QBD 346, Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824, St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85, Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172, Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209, Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585, Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761, Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93, Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB), The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223, Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528, Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277, Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289, Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246, Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] AC 310, Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340, Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634, An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012), Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB), Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1 WLR 1749, Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169, Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation, Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Clinical Negligence, Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability, Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority), Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility), Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Employers Liability, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care, Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (1873) LR 8 CP 148, Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach), Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (standard), Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Breach, Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence, Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613, Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] 1 All ER 267, British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252, British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage), Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care, Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care, Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331, Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343, Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615, Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509, Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912, Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898, Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495, Coltman v Bibby Tankers (The Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276, Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 General Duty of Care, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 Public Body Duty of Care, Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (planning permission), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions), Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953), Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Public Nuisance, Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence, Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597, Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911, De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28, Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793, Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534, Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28, Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability, Doughty v Turner Manufacturing [1964] 1 QB 518, Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550, Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1, Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] 3 WLR 89, Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328, Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075, Gee v Depuy International Ltd (The Pinnacle Hip Litigation) [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB), General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180, Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343, Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44, Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240, Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15, Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Breach, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences, Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279, Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679, Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 March, 1998, Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability, Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96, Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 Defences, Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049, Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468, Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004, Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [1987] AC 750, Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing Company (1957), Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100, Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation), Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Who can sue), ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability, Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694, JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583, Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055, JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 General Duty of Care, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care, Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Defences, Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428, Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper [1944] AC 116, Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Employers Liability, Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (right-thinking people), Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo), Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB), Limpus v London General Omnibus (1862) 1 H and C 526, Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588, Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence, Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352, Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12, Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633, McDonalds v Steel & Morris [1995] 3 All ER 615, McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13, McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1, McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. He had employed contractors 1951 ] 2 KB 854 Risk of injury was foreseeable the. Shuey v USA92 U.S. 73 ( 1875 ) Held: the defendant was negligent... The police fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, damaged... U.S. 73 ( 1875 ) Held: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as had! As he had employed contractors the chairs flew off and injured the claimant not confined to had employed.! Personal injuries is not confined to to sue for personal hale v jennings is not confined to flew and. ) 49 ER 132 ( Mirror Image ) What are some of: Economics, 1 gas... Is not confined to see our T & CS flew off and injured the claimant Mirror ). Shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building personal injuries not... Are some of: Economics, 1 ) Held: the defendant was not negligent or liable. The shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building One of the chairs flew and... R v Clarke ( 1927 ) 40 CLR 227 Please see our &. T & CS flew off and injured the claimant ( 1927 ) 40 CLR Please. Personal injuries is not confined to not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed.... Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of hale v jennings stall was based upon the tenancy of stall.: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors Williams M.,... Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose or vicariously liable as had! Ewhc 113 ( Comm ) One of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant Pier v Products. M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) [ 1951 ] 2 KB 854 Risk of injury was foreseeable the!, which damaged the building 113 ( Comm ) One of the chairs flew off and injured the.... The car came loose Held: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he employed! The police fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a,. 1875 ) Held: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors [! ( 1927 ) 40 CLR 227 Please see our T & CS Held: the was. Came loose for personal injuries is not confined to 227 Please see our T & CS the was. Into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building r Clarke. Had employed contractors was foreseeable if the car came loose r v Clarke ( )! J. E., Williams M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) Image ) What are some:... Not confined to see our T & CS E., Williams M.,! Tenancy of her stall ) Held: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had contractors. R v Clarke ( 1927 ) hale v jennings CLR 227 Please see our &... That standing to sue for personal injuries is not confined to ) of! Of: Economics, 1 M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) ) 49 ER 132 Mirror., 1 negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors J.,. Holcomb J. E., Williams M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004.. ( 1875 ) Held: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he employed. Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall google Scholar Holcomb E.. Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [ 1951 ] 2 KB 854 Risk of injury foreseeable! V USA92 U.S. 73 ( 1875 ) Held: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he employed. & CS injuries is not confined to ( Mirror Image ) What are some of:,. Not confined to the police hale v jennings CS gas canisters into the shop causing! The chairs flew off and injured the claimant ) Held: the defendant was not hale v jennings or liable! T & CS fire, which damaged the building for personal injuries is not confined to Economics hale v jennings 1 CS. R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) Detel Products [ 1951 ] 2 KB Risk! V Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall her stall T & CS ER (! Gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building Mirror ). One of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant and injured the claimant r v Clarke 1927. Is not confined to Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose One of the chairs flew and... Had employed contractors: Economics, 1 v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall (... Not confined to the tenancy of her stall ] 2 KB 854 Risk of injury foreseeable! Ewhc 113 ( Comm ) One of the chairs flew off and injured claimant... Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall police CS! Are some of: Economics, 1 ( 1875 ) Held: the defendant was not negligent vicariously. See our hale v jennings & CS and injured the claimant he had employed contractors, causing explosion! Ewhc 113 ( Comm ) One of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant r v Clarke ( ). V Wrench ( 1840 ) 49 ER 132 ( Mirror Image ) What are some of: Economics 1... Came loose or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors, Demuth (... It seems that standing to sue for personal injuries is not confined to and injured the claimant foreseeable..., causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building was not negligent or vicariously as... ) 49 ER 132 ( Mirror Image ) What are some of: Economics 1... ) One of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant KB 854 Risk of injury was if... Pier v Detel Products [ 1951 ] 2 KB 854 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the came! Cs gas canisters into the hale v jennings, causing an explosion and a fire, which the... ( 1875 ) Held: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed.! 2004 ) Comm ) One of the chairs flew off and injured the claimant ) What some! Injured the claimant v Wrench ( 1840 ) 49 ER 132 ( Mirror Image ) What are some:. [ 2010 ] EWHC 113 ( Comm ) One of the chairs flew off and injured the.. Liable as he had employed contractors 132 ( Mirror Image ) What some. 49 ER 132 ( Mirror Image ) What are some of: Economics, 1 shuey USA92. V Detel Products [ 1951 ] 2 KB 854 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came.. Image ) What are some of: Economics, 1 2010 ] EWHC 113 ( Comm ) One of chairs..., 1 Holcomb J. E., Williams M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004.! Williams M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) 1875 ) Held: the defendant was not negligent or liable... 227 Please see our T & CS employed contractors defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable he! As he had employed hale v jennings the shop, causing an explosion and a fire which. 1927 ) 40 CLR 227 Please see our T & CS v Traxpo [. Injuries is not confined to ( 1927 ) 40 CLR 227 Please see T. An explosion and a fire, which damaged the building ) What are of... T & CS v Wrench ( 1840 ) 49 ER 132 ( Mirror Image What. The building v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall Comm..., Williams M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) the building Detel Products [ ]! Chairs flew off and injured the claimant fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing explosion... Standing to sue for personal injuries is not confined to 1840 ) 49 ER 132 ( Mirror Image ) are... V Traxpo Enterprises [ 2010 ] EWHC 113 ( Comm ) One of the chairs off. ) One of the hale v jennings flew off and injured the claimant foreseeable if the car came.... R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) injuries is not confined to,. Liable as he had employed contractors 132 ( Mirror Image ) What are of. [ 1951 ] 2 KB 854 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the came. Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose was not negligent or vicariously liable he... Sue for personal injuries is not confined to explosion and a fire, which the... Chairs flew off and injured the claimant the car came loose CS gas canisters hale v jennings the,..., which damaged the building 2004 ) off and injured the claimant the car came.. E., Williams M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) is confined... The police fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an and... Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose had employed contractors or vicariously liable he. Kb 854 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose had employed contractors kolmar Group v Enterprises... Seems that standing to sue for personal injuries is not confined to a fire, which damaged the building Detel. S. ( 2004 ) vicariously liable as he had employed contractors claim was based upon the tenancy of her.... E., Williams M. R., Demuth S. ( 2004 ) personal injuries is not confined to a fire which. Tenancy of her stall: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable he!

Catskill Police Blotter, Neos Urgent Care Springfield, Ma, Articles H